The Monetary Authority's remedy plan for Korda Territory was published to the NRS at 09:14. By 12:40, Seren Mak had issued a statement. By 14:00, she had held a press availability in Rhovane. By 17:30, her campaign had distributed a one-page summary of the MA's three recommendations to every Assembly member in her coalition. It was, by any measure, a good day for Mak.

"The MA plan confirms what the EM found and what I've been saying since Month 11," she said at the Rhovane availability. "The formula doesn't have a displacement modifier. Nobody put one in because nobody planned for Korda to be absorbing Lake Varda population movement at this scale while also running a coast guard operation at three times normal cost. That's not a fiscal administration failure. That's a design gap, and design gaps are a legislative problem."

"The formula doesn't have a displacement modifier. That's not a fiscal administration failure. That's a design gap, and design gaps are a legislative problem."

The MA plan contains three recommendations: an emergency supplemental transfer calculated at 2.3% of federal discretionary allocation; a 180-day formula recalibration review; and a joint determination by the Legislature and both executives on whether coast guard costs during active humanitarian response should be excluded from the territorial fiscal floor calculation. Mak endorsed all three within her first statement, before the press availability, which is unusual — most candidates in a LC race are careful about endorsing MA recommendations on fiscal mechanisms they don't yet control.

She was asked whether she thought the Legislature would act before the 90-day window closed. "The window closes Month 4 Day 29," she said. "I know the date. I've known it since the EM published in Month 1. The question is whether the people in that chamber know it the same way I do — not as a deadline in a document, but as a date by which something either happens or it doesn't." She paused. "Some of them will find out which one it is."

The other three declared candidates had not issued statements on the MA plan by press time. Tobias Vael's office confirmed receipt. Pell Sandris's campaign said he was reviewing the document. Director Carrow, who does not have a campaign office in the conventional sense, did not respond to a request for comment.

The Korda file has moved faster than anyone in the race anticipated when it surfaced in Month 1. The EM's interim review, Carrow's intelligence summary on the Sunderland-Lake Varda corridor, the LC's profile interview in Month 2 — each piece has landed in a different way, but they have all landed on the same territory. Mak's argument has been consistent since Vardenmere: this is an infrastructure problem wearing a diplomatic costume. The MA filing does not use those words. It comes close.

After the availability, I asked Mak whether she thought the Korda situation had changed the race. She considered the question for longer than usual. "I think it clarified it," she said. "There's a difference."